Walking the Line: Likability and Truth on the Expert Witness Stand

Stanford University

Praxis Med Experts founder and infectious disease specialist, Dr. F. Ramzi Asfour, recently participated in a mock trial led by the International Association of Defense Counsel (IADC) at Stanford. For educational purposes, Dr. Asfour assumed the role of a neurologist, illustrating the complexities of building trust and maintaining objectivity in the courtroom. It is important to note that his participation was strictly for training; his clinical practice centers on internal medicine and infectious diseases.

The Role of Likability

Findings from the IADC event highlight that jurors respond positively to experts who communicate with clarity and approachability. A professional demeanor, enhanced by appropriate humor, helps facilitate understanding. For instance, Dr. Asfour’s anecdotal reference to age in his portrayal fostered a brief connection with the audience. However, likability must reinforce, not replace, credibility. The expert witness’s main responsibility is to present testimony that is clear, consistent, and factual, keeping truth and impartiality at the forefront.

Handling Cross-Examination on the Expert Witness Stand

Robust cross-examination is central to testing an expert’s reliability. Dr. Asfour’s experience, along with relevant professional discussions, shows that experts build trust by remaining composed and treating challenging questions as part of the legal process. Reacting defensively can undermine credibility. Maintaining professionalism and honesty, even under pressure, is critical for earning juror confidence.

Principles for Credibility

• Communicate clearly and empathetically while prioritizing objectivity.

• Respond to tough questions professionally, without defensiveness on the expert witness stand.

• Transparently acknowledge any limitations; honesty strengthens trust.

• Maintain consistency by understanding all case facts and timelines.

Broader Considerations

Dr. Asfour’s trial experience reinforces that courtroom trust is built upon preparation, humility, and respect for legal proceedings. Experts who balance communication skills with unwavering impartiality gain the confidence of both jurors and attorneys, ensuring testimony that is accessible, reliable, and ethically grounded. It remains essential for experts to deliver testimony only within their validated areas of competence, always adhering to ethical and legal standards that preserve integrity in legal proceedings.

To collaborate with leading medical experts for your case, contact us for more information.

Disclaimer: This post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every case is unique, and legal professionals should consult appropriate resources for specific guidance.